I am going to be building a new PC, and I figure I might as well power it up enough for RFactor2. Any seen specs anywhere???
I am going to be building a new PC, and I figure I might as well power it up enough for RFactor2. Any seen specs anywhere???
I would suggest you use the most powerful components that you can afford![]()
Brian Farmer
Admin CMS World Division
Intell Q9450 2.66/4G Corsair Dominator Ram/Asus Rampage Formula MB/2 ATI HD4870's Crossfired/Dell Ultrasharp 2408WFP 24" widescreen LCD Monitor/Creative X-fi Fatality/TSW Digital Evolution with ball bearings, GT pedal pads spread gas and brakes, load cell brakes, Momo 12c wheel with paddle shifters, 7 button cover. Reversed pedals for hanging instalation,home made simpod featuring Aura Pro bass shaker, Dayton SA 70 subwoofer amp to provide some rumble under the Corbeau Fx1 Pro racing seat./Vista Ultimate SP2 32bit/Broadband 20mb down/2mb up/Linksys WRT54GS wireless router/Left foot breaker...
Give this a look......
System requirements - rFactor 2 Open Documentation
Case-HAF922, Motherboard-ASUS SABERTOOTH X58, Ram-12GB GSKILL, Processor-I7-950, DVD Burner-ASUS X 2, Power Supply-Corsair HX850, Wheel-G25, Monitor-LG 24" HD 1920 X 1200, Video Card-EVGA GeForce GTX 570 (Fermi) HD 2560MB 320-bit GDDR5-70" Hitachi HDTV for race nights
Ron, check out some of the hardware discussion threads we have going in the rFactor 2 section. But you definitely want as much as you can get. Modern for sure. I would say a dual/quad core processor, and 8 GB of RAM if you can afford it, and something along the lines of an AMD/ATI HD6870 or up for optimal experience. Hope to have you racing with us again soon, really miss having you on the track - you are one of the original guys!![]()
__________________________________
david anderson | champion motorsports
@info_cms | cms facebook | cms blogs
Mine is better too, but I have not jumped yet to Rf2 so I can not comment just trying to share what I have read. It is my understanding that you will need at least a DUAL CORE processor over 3.0 ghz and over 4Mb of ram. Mine is a Quad i7 950 12GB ram and GTX570 2560mb.
Case-HAF922, Motherboard-ASUS SABERTOOTH X58, Ram-12GB GSKILL, Processor-I7-950, DVD Burner-ASUS X 2, Power Supply-Corsair HX850, Wheel-G25, Monitor-LG 24" HD 1920 X 1200, Video Card-EVGA GeForce GTX 570 (Fermi) HD 2560MB 320-bit GDDR5-70" Hitachi HDTV for race nights
Like many apps, rfactor2 isn't going to use more than a couple cores, so given a choice go for clock speed over core count. Things like hyperthreading won't help a bit, so a fast i5 is plenty of CPU.
8 GB of RAM is a must. The faster, the better. If you're going Intel, pay the premium for a Sandy Bridge CPU so you don't get bottle-necked by the bridge chip.
I'm getting a solid 60 fps with a GTX 560 Ti on a 1080p lcd. If you have more screens or higher resolution, you may need more GPU. Nvidia cards seem pretty solid in rfactor2 right now. Radeon cards seem to be more problematic, though many work fine.
Last but not least, Win 7 64-bit so your system can use all that RAM. rfactor2 is only a 32-bit app, but this way it gets a full 4GB of physical memory instead of having to share with the OS.
PC I built last year runs it just fine with almost all on full, and if need be I could overclock it (first PC I've owned that I've not OC'd it) if need be someday. Need to put it all on full and see what it does. Ha Ha.
Intel I5-760 Quad Core
Asus P33 MB
8GB DDR3
nVidia GTX460 1GB (factory OC)
Asus 24" 1080P Monitor (the only way to play games!)
Andandtech has great build guides on low, med, high priced PC's....and PCperspective is another great place to learn bang for buck.
I built a new box recently with rF2 in mind, and went with the fastest SINGLE video card (Nvidia) I could find, a MSI GTX580 3GB "Lightning Extreme." It's showing me about 150 FPS on average with the 60's cars at Spa.
Two points here: 3GB was the highest GPU memory I could get (at the time of purchase), and, since it's Nvidia, it's all I'll be able to use even if I buy a second card down the road for SLI.
2): usable SLI apparently requires previous experience--namely that "profiles" be built for any given application. As I understand the current situation, the profiles are not yet in place, so SLI users are experiencing WORSE performance than are single card users like myself.
I believe most also expect SLI to catch up soon...and surpass single card solutions (at least as far as Nvidia GPU boards go).
I race myself using only a single image (projector) so I'm personally feeling I won't now add that second GPU, regardless of any FPS increase that might eventually be realized from SLI--I can't see any point (since the projector only puts up 60 FPS anyway)...unless I move again into 3D. And that's going to require a new projector anyway (or another of the same model I have now, plus a lot of other parts, one set for each eyeball).
------
Rest of my box is a i2600K on aircooling. i2500K will do pretty much the same, and for 2/3 the cost (so go with that unless you need other multicore/hyperthreaded apps).
I did also go for max memory (16GB when I bought)--make SURE you buy into at least Win64-pro if you go this route, as the "home" versions will not support full systemboard (and GPU) memory usage.
CS
Bookmarks